In a May 2011 press release, the WHO/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as a possible human carcinogen due to an increased risk of a malignant brain cancer known as glioma. The IARC report associates cell phone use with an increase in glioma cases. A group of 31 scientists from 14 countries has met in Lyon, France to discuss and assess the potential dangers of continued exposure to these fields.
Does Everything Cause Cancer These Days?
It seems as if the major news media outlets report a new cause for cancer almost daily. In listening to these reports, people become fatigued, feeling hopeless and as if they may as well ignore any and all reports on carcinogenic agents. This is a dangerous attitude. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services smoking is directly attributable to 30 percent of cancer deaths and obesity to 20 percent. People can greatly reduce their cancer risk from these by stopping smoking, exercising, and eating a balanced diet.
Now the new Group 2B classification of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields marks cell phones and other wireless devices as possibly carcinogenic in humans. The 2B classification can mean that research has found inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity in humans, but sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in animals. The IARC may classify agents in the 2B category for a number of other reasons as well, including strong evidence from mechanistic or other correlative data. Must Americans now give up their beloved high-tech gadgets?
Are Cell Phone Concerns Valid?
According to Ann Louise Gittleman, PhD. and best-selling author of “Zapped”, concerns over the hazards of electronic pollution are well founded and valid. In my recent interview with her, Gittleman said, “A precautionary approach is best in case we learn down the line that these electromagnetic fields adversely affect the brains and hearts of humans.” She goes on to emphasize that the topic deserves far more research and attention than it has been given in the past. Gittleman is under no illusion that Americans are going to give up their cell phones and other wireless gadgets any time soon. She states that additional research can provide us with the information needed to safely live with these high-tech devices.
Wireless Device Dangers
Anything wireless is suspect when it comes to possible dangers and increased cancer risks. The IARC Working Group of international scientists did not quantify the risks, but a recent study of past cell phone use up to 2004, conducted by the Interphone Study Group showed a 40 percent increased risk of gliomas for those using cell phones for 30 minutes or more daily over a ten year period. Other studies show an increase in acoustic neuromas, which are benign tumors of the nerve connecting the ear to the brain, from extensive use of wireless devices, such as blue-tooth headsets. About blue-tooth devices Dr. Gittleman had this to say, “Blue-tooth brings up an additional red flag as the wireless frequencies, produced by these devices, go directly into the ear.”
Keeping Yourself and Your Family Safe
Gittleman has uncovered some of the hidden dangers lurking in the home and everyday life as well as how to minimize and prevent adverse effects from them. Don’t get Zapped! Follow these simple safety tips taken from her book and my interview with her:
- Go retro and get a corded phone. Cordless phones are even more hazardous than cell phones. They constantly emit electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs). Having a cordless phone is like having a cell tower in your own home.
- Move your bed or couch if they are on a wall behind your refrigerator, and try not to have your bed in a room over a ceiling fan.
- Avoid using mobile phones in a confined space like the car, elevator, or subway. In these confined spaces, the phone needs to work much harder to get a signal, causing the power level to increase.
- Keep cell phones at least 7 to 8 inches from the body. Use a wired earpiece to accomplish this or air tube headsets, which reduce radiation at the head significantly.
- Children should use a wired phone (landline) when making calls. Read more about the dangers of EMFs to children in Gittleman’s book.
- Use a hard-wired Internet router rather than the popular wireless units used so often today.
- When travelling, try to stay in hotels without Wi-Fi.
- Many coffee houses and other similar establishments are Internet hotspots, meaning they provide wireless Internet for customer use. Get your coffee or snack and leave rather than sitting and conducting business using their Wi-Fi connection.
Dr. Gittleman has a very personal reason behind her efforts to educate the public about the dangers of EMF emissions. She developed a tumor in her parotid gland, which was caused by her cell phone use. Startled by this revelation, she began her journey to inform people about this silent danger.
Other Voices Speak Out About EMF Dangers
Dr. Jeffery Morrison, a medical doctor and best selling author of “Cleanse Your Body, Clear Your Mind”, also states that concerns over cell phone use and other devices that emit EMFs are valid. Morrison says, “Cell phones generate an electromagnetic field that is almost like the ionizing radiation from X-rays, but at a much lower dose. Certain people are getting a lot of exposure to this [EMFs] and it accumulates in their bodies.” He advocates the following tips to mitigate the risks associated with cell phone use:
- Use a hands-free system for speaking on the cell phone in the car. People can have these hard-wired into their vehicles
- Use the cell phone built-in microphone option whenever possible
- Get a landline installed in the home
- Corded ear buds offer a low-cost option for those hoping to reduce risk, but don’t lay the cell phone in your lap while using them.
Morrison goes on to remark, “Since the WHO labeled EMFs as possibly carcinogenic to humans, this puts them in the same category as DDT, lead, and gasoline. People should take notice.”
Dr. Morrison uses a unique combination of Environmental and Conventional Medicine in his practice. He strives to help patients revitalize their bodies and minds by transforming the way they think about things they eat and purchase. His medical training and training as a Nutrition Specialist have lead him to create his highly effective program Daily Benefit to help people achieve ideal health through diet detoxification.
Conclusions
People should take the concerns about EMF emissions and the IARC assessment seriously. As time passes, evidence that corroborates or refutes the concerns will emerge. Until then, people would be wise to heed the warnings of experts, such as Drs. Gittleman and Morrison.
References
“Acoustic neuroma – PubMed Health.” National Center for Biotechnology Information. Pub Med Health, 24 May 2010. Web. 14 June 2011. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0001782/>.
Gittleman, PhD., Ann Louise. Zapped. New York City: Harper Collins, 2010. Print.
“IARC CLASSIFIES RADIOFREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS AS POSSIBLY CARCINOGENIC TO HUMANS.” International Agency for Research on Cancer. N.p., 31 May 2011. Web. 14 June 2011. <www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf>.
Largavaara,, S., et al, “Location of Gliomas in Relation to Mobile Telephon… [Am J Epidemiol. 2011] – PubMed result.” National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubMed, n.d. Web. 14 June 2011. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21610117>.









#1 by Columba Lisa on June 14, 2011 - 6:10 PM
Hey Sam,
This is important. Thanks for the information. What do you think about the new xray scanners at airports? I had to go through one recently. I was not happy about that.
I think I’m going to get a corded phone for my basement. I rarely use my cell phone, but I’ve used a cordless phone a LOT these past 11 years!
Thanks again – very useful post!
#2 by Samantha Gluck on June 14, 2011 - 9:54 PM
Thanks so much for reading, Lisa, and for your support. Yes, it’s disturbing that cordless phones pose and even larger danger than cell phones. Dr. Gittleman’s book is really eye-opening. I don’t usually get all hysterical about the “latest” reports of cancer causing agents, but the studies and facts in this book have definitely made me think twice. Samantha
#3 by Tom on June 14, 2011 - 10:55 PM
You wrote that Dr. Gittleman “developed a tumor in her parotid gland, which was caused by her cell phone use.” How does she know this to be true?
The idea that technology could have such an immediate adverse effect on our health is alarming. I agree with your conclusion that only time will tell whether these concerns are real — especially since the technologies in question are so new.
The challenge is to balance caution with reason.
#4 by Samantha Gluck on June 15, 2011 - 12:06 AM
Tom,
Yes, I do not know how she knows that the tumor in her parotid gland developed as a result of her cell phone use, but this is her claim in her book and elsewhere. I may continue this theme in a series with some other physician interviews where they talk about development of these and other tumors, why they develop (as far as they know), etc.. The thing I really liked about Dr. Gittleman is that while she approaches the subject with more vigor than I probably would, she is reasonable in that she realizes that these technological advances enhance our lives in a number of ways and people aren’t likely to turn away from them any time soon. I believe her passion is rooted in her personal experience with the parotid tumor regardless of its cause. She is vital, relatively young, and doesn’t engage in unhealthy behaviors so the revelation of the tumor was probably quite shocking to her.
Dr. Morrison also speaks from a voice of reason when he offers his tips for safety — just in case a real and imminent danger exists.
In my opinion, the challenge to balance reason with caution is relevant in all facets of our lives — not just healthcare. Thanks, Tom, for your always intelligent and insightful commentary.
Samantha
#5 by Tom on June 15, 2011 - 2:02 AM
All good points. I see a great deal of value in the role these doctors (and others) are playing by keeping this issue top of mind and encouraging dialogue. Whether cell phones cause cancer or not is still up for debate, but we won’t get a conclusive answer either way without this kind of research and discussion.
#6 by Samantha Gluck on June 15, 2011 - 3:40 AM
Thanks Tom and I agree, dialogue, coupled with solid research, goes a long way toward fomenting understanding and the realization of fact. Samantha xoxo
#7 by Ronae Jull on June 16, 2011 - 2:33 PM
Great article Sam, and one I read with interest. I fall into the category of those who are rather jaded regarding the constant flood of information on all the things that (could) cause cancer. While I think caution is important, and balance is key, I am also reminded of something I keep in mind with my own research: “correlation does not equal causation”.
While science continues to try to determine definitively whether or not there actually is a causative relationship between EMF exposure and human cancers, I agree with your note of cautious balance. Even if the ultimate conclusion is that there is no causative relationship, it can’t possibly hurt to reduce exposure.
Now to go hook up my corded phone again!
RJ, the Hope Coach
http://jrrsehopecoaching.com
#8 by Samantha Gluck on June 16, 2011 - 3:09 PM
Your comment made me smile, RJ, and I totally agree with you. I don’t know if you read the comment by my friend, Tom, but he says essentially the same thing — we must balance caution with reason. It is unfortunate that many people believe that correlation equals causation. I understand why the general public believes this — but I would have thought people would have a better hold on how to spot valid vs. invalid or poorly carried out research. I think we would do well to proceed with caution and as I mentioned in the piece — I like that the doctors I interviewed weren’t hysterically demanding that we stop using all wireless devices and the like. They are both well-grounded individuals who feel similarly to the way you feel — it can’t hurt to be cautious. If we later find out that there is no danger at all (or very minimal), we can go right back wireless-world.
Always a pleasure to read your take on things, RJ.
#9 by Becky Jane on June 16, 2011 - 10:10 PM
Samantha,
Wouldn’t it be fun to step back in time and live a more simple life? Since we can’t and I do love the world we live in, so what I can’t change, I can pray about.
The safety measures in your post are worth implementing as much as possible.
Thanks!
#10 by Samantha Gluck on June 17, 2011 - 12:41 AM
It would definitely be fun as well as a challenge. I use my smartphone for my business. One of the benefits of freelancing is the ability to work from anywhere — the poolside, the lakeside, the park, the backyard, etc., I use my smartphone to take calls from current and potential clients, interview experts for pieces I’m working on, post to FB and engage with my Twitter followers throughout the day. I don’t think I can lose the smartphone. I can, and probably will, make the other changes the experts suggested, including investing in an airtube handsfree device for talking on the phone.
#11 by April on June 19, 2011 - 12:13 PM
Fascinating site…
#12 by Samantha Gluck on June 19, 2011 - 1:41 PM
Thank you April. The scope of topics about medicine and healthcare are the result of my research and client projects for select healthcare professionals and facilities. I appreciate your visit.
Samantha
#13 by Nikki on June 19, 2011 - 2:09 PM
Great site! Visiting from voiceBoks! I am now following you on twitter! I didn’t see any other way to follow you, but if there is let me know so I can! Thanks!
-Nikki
http://chef-n-training.blogspot.com/
#14 by Samantha Gluck on June 19, 2011 - 5:49 PM
You are so sweet for visiting. Maybe we’ll collaborate for a guest post where you offer advice on healthy menus and a few recipes. This website and twitter are all for now. My freelance writing website will launch soon. I’ll have a virtual voiceBoks party when that happens. Samantha
#15 by Lisa Ladrido on June 20, 2011 - 12:07 AM
I think the cell phone companies are able to keep the chatter down about the potential health dangers that EMF exposure may cause. When I worked for hospice we had several areas around the towers that had a high population of children with leukemia and other cancers. Was this just a coincidence or caused by other pollutants in the area? I guess we won’t know that answer unless we call in Erin Brockovich! You can actually check this website for the towers near your address. Antenna Search
#16 by Samantha Gluck on June 20, 2011 - 2:28 PM
Thanks for your comment, Lisa. Regarding your question about the high number of children with leukemia: there are no coincidences. Something caused the numbers to spike, but knowing the factors will probably remain a mystery for a long time — even if Erin B. got involved. Despite all we know about the human body and its mechanisms, there is more that we do not know.
#17 by RachelJoy on June 20, 2011 - 7:25 AM
Great article. It’s interesting that here (Philippines) people text rather than talk on their cell phones since talking consumes more paid credit, but surprisingly iPads are very common since you can get them very cheap and there are a lot of wi-fi places…either way this is very good useful information.
#18 by Samantha Gluck on June 20, 2011 - 2:31 PM
Rachel,
I’m glad you found the piece informative. Please keep in mind, that the WHO just assessed EMF as a possible human carcinogen. Much more research on the subject is required before we know for sure. I hope readers take away a cautionary warning and heed at least some of the safety tips just in case. Enjoy this wonderful technology; just enjoy it with an alert mind and responsibly.
Samantha